Op-Ed Putting the Kotel Decision in Context

Key Findings:

The authors discuss the aftermath of the Israeli government's decision in June 2017 to freeze the Western Wall agreement and advance a conversion bill, which sparked dramatic reactions from Jewish leaders and organizations worldwide.

Five key conclusions arise from the situation:

1. While most Israelis are sympathetic to Reform and Conservative Judaism and support the Kotel agreement, they have been less inclined to engage in political conflict over it compared to the influential ultra-Orthodox community. The progressive Jewish movements have utilized the High Court and the support of the American Jewish community as leverage, but the Prime Minister's decision to yield to ultra-Orthodox pressure may indicate a potential weakening of these leverage points over Israeli policies.

2. Symbolic aspects pose the greatest challenge in promoting a more religiously pluralistic Israel, while practical advancements are currently more attainable. While symbolism remains important, the progressive Jewish movements have adopted a long-term strategy focusing on practical victories and grassroots efforts to translate sympathy into political support, making symbolic gains easier to achieve in the future.

3. The Israeli government underestimated the strong response from world Jewish leaders, reflecting long-standing frustrations over perceived erosion of liberal democracy in Israeli society. The government needs to address these concerns swiftly and sensitively to repair relations and avoid losing critical support from many Reform and Conservative Jews who feel betrayed and offended.

4. The Israeli government and the Israeli Rabbinate should take note of the trends in Israeli society. As the ultra-Orthodox-controlled Rabbinate tightens its hold on power through legislation and political maneuvering, it risks losing appeal and relevance among average Israelis. Increasing numbers of secular, traditional, and even Orthodox individuals are seeking religious alternatives outside of the Rabbinate's control, potentially rendering it irrelevant to a significant portion of the population.

5. The events underscore the need for two important discussions. First, within Israeli society, there should be a conversation about the relationship between religion and state. Second, the discussion should extend to Israel's relationship with the global Jewish Diaspora, exploring the symbolic and practical implications of Israel being the "homeland for all the Jews."

Navigating these issues with sensitivity and prompt resolution is crucial for maintaining Jewish unity both within Israel and between Israel and the Diaspora.