top of page
Boundless Logo_Hor.png

Digital Library

Antisemitism in Independent K-12 Schools Post-October 7

Topic:

Antisemitism & Antizionism, Israel & Regional Politics

Principal Investigators:

Not listed

Study Date: 

2025

Source:

Ratings & Assessments Institute,Center to Combat Antisemitism in Education,Anti-Defamation League (ADL)

Key Findings:

Following the October 7 Hamas terrorist attacks on Israel, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) recorded a significant surge in antisemitic incidents across the United States, with a particularly troubling spike in K–12 educational environments. Between October 7, 2023, and January 7, 2024, there was a 360% increase in antisemitic incidents nationwide compared to the same period the previous year, totaling over 3,280 reported cases. While public schools have previously been a focus of such analyses, the ADL’s recent report turned attention to independent (non-public, private) K–12 schools, where Jewish families reported high levels of concern. 


According to a national survey of over 1,000 Jewish parents whose children attend independent schools, nearly half (45.3%) said their children had either witnessed or directly experienced antisemitic behavior since October 7. This behavior included verbal harassment, social ostracization, the display of antisemitic symbols, and in some cases, physical intimidation. Additionally, nearly one-third (31.7%) of parents noted problematic or biased curriculum content related to Jews, Israel, or the Israeli-Palestinian conflict—often portraying Israel in a one-sided or delegitimizing manner.


Moreover, 25.2% of parents observed antisemitic graffiti or imagery within school premises, while a notable portion (21.3%) said they never reported incidents due to concerns about retaliation or skepticism that any meaningful response would follow. A major theme that emerged from the findings was the inadequacy of school responses: over one-third of parents rated their school’s handling of antisemitic incidents as “somewhat” or “very inadequate.” Many reported that administrators minimized the seriousness of these events, failed to acknowledge Jewish students’ concerns, or treated antisemitism as a politically uncomfortable issue rather than a form of bigotry warranting clear action. 


The ADL report also criticized Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives at independent schools for often excluding Jews and antisemitism from their frameworks, creating environments where Jewish students and families felt marginalized and invisible. ADL leaders, including CEO Jonathan Greenblatt and VP Shira Goodman, emphasized that this silence or inaction effectively communicates that antisemitism is tolerable within these institutions.


To counter this trend, the ADL has launched several support initiatives aimed at empowering Jewish families and increasing accountability among independent schools. These include the Jewish Leaders in Schools (JLS) program, a parent advocacy network offering tools and resources for engagement, and the K–12 Antisemitism Legal Line, which provides families with free legal guidance on how to address antisemitic incidents through appropriate legal channels. These efforts seek to close the accountability gap that exists in independent schools, which are not subject to the same public oversight or regulatory requirements as public schools. 


Although overall antisemitic incidents in U.S. schools declined by about 26% in 2024 from 2023 levels (down to 860 total incidents in K–12 education), the unique challenges faced by Jewish families in the independent school sector remain serious and largely unresolved.

Methodology:

The ADL conducted a national survey of more than 1,000 Jewish parents across various independent schools. Respondents were asked a range of questions about their children's experiences with antisemitism, school responses, curricular content, and overall school climate since October 7, 2023.


The survey assessed: (1) Direct and witnessed antisemitic incidents (e.g., verbal harassment, bullying, social exclusion, symbols, or threats); (2) Curriculum-related issues, including biased or delegitimizing content about Jews or Israel; (3) Observations of antisemitic imagery or graffiti within schools; (4) Parental engagement with school administration, including whether they reported incidents and how the schools responded.


The ADL’s broader dataset of antisemitic incidents in the U.S. (used for the 360% post–October 7 surge figure) is drawn from: (1) Direct reports submitted to the ADL via its incident-reporting systems; (2) Media coverage, law enforcement, and community sources; (3) Incident verification through ADL investigators to confirm credibility.


The survey relies on self-reported experiences and perceptions of parents, not necessarily official school documentation. There may be response bias, meaning that parents more concerned about antisemitism may have been more likely to respond. The survey does not identify individual schools, which means findings are generalized across the independent school sector.

bottom of page